License-plate rationing limits when a car may be driven, hoping to relieve congestion by removing some vehicles from the road. But travelers differ in their time values and their ability to adapt. A restriction that looks uniform on paper may have unequal consequences and may even encourage households to buy another car.
Unrestricted travel gives way to a moderate restriction and then a tighter one. The final act emphasizes the second-car response: wealthier travelers can escape the rule while others cannot. Comparing travel outcomes and social cost shows why a stricter restriction need not improve welfare. This is the central policy warning in the model: reducing legal access to a particular vehicle is not the same as efficiently allocating scarce road space. Behavioral adaptation and unequal resources can weaken the congestion benefit and shift its burden toward travelers with fewer options. The demonstration is an illustrative realization of the paper's mechanism, not a forecast for every city.
The effect of automated vehicles on traffic may change as adoption grows. In this video's modeled setting, early automated vehicles keep generous following gaps and can lower network efficiency. When more vehicles become equipped and coordinated operation develops, their mutual gaps shrink and the effect can reverse.
Watch film
A monthly travel-credit allowance creates a new decision beyond whether to drive today: how much should be saved for trips that may arise later? A routine commute can often be shifted to transit, while an unexpected urgent trip may be much harder to replace.
Watch film
Delivery vehicles compete for a small number of curb spaces. Without a schedule, an arriving vehicle may find every bay occupied, block the adjacent lane, and delay both other deliveries and through traffic. Reserving a time window is one way to coordinate access before a vehicle reaches the curb.
Watch film